ONE BACKING TRACK. THREE WORKFLOWS.

Comparing three guitar-solo generation methods

Three ways of generating a guitar solo using the same backing track and ACE-Step model.

Listen first. Make your own comparison.

  1. Start with the backing. Then listen to a solo with the backing.
  2. Compare the same moment. Stay in one round and switch methods. Listen for fit, phrasing and joins.
  3. Make your own judgement. Leave a note if you like, then choose whether to reveal Shaozhi’s reasoning.
Start comparing

NOW SELECTED

Loading audio…

Download WAV
Loads only these three versions. You can also press Play to load one.
WAVEFORM · ABSOLUTE PEAK AMPLITUDE

Drag across the waveform to repeat any passage. Click once to seek.

No custom selection. Drag on the waveform or enter start and end times.

0:00/—

Select a version, then press play.

The musical outline

Click a section to jump there. Repeating keeps the same section when you switch methods.

Optional feedback for the selected solo

AFTER YOUR OWN LISTEN

Shaozhi’s reasoning

Kept hidden so you can form your own impression first. Opening this is optional.

How the selected method works

THE QUESTION BEHIND THE COMPARISON

Does the way we generate the solo change the result?

We want to compare how the three workflows sound over the same backing track, and how consistently they work across generation rounds.

Listen for how well the guitar fits the backing, whether the phrases and section changes feel natural, and whether the solo follows the musical outline. Also notice the guitar tone, noise, distortion or sudden changes in sound.

Try a few rounds if you have time. Does an impression hold across different takes? We are comparing the complete workflows, without assuming that one will sound better.